rs-california-sales-tax Archives - Page 6 of 6 - Brotman Law - All Rights Reserved | 402 W Broadway, Suite 800 • San Diego, California 92101

The CDTFA and California Tax Liens

August 12, 2024June 22, 2016 by Brotman Law

The consequences of falling behind on your taxes are difficult for anyone, but when we are talking about businesses, sales taxes, and the California Department of Tax and Fee Administration (CDTFA), the results can be devastating. The CDTFA is particularly aggressive about investigating and pursuing unpaid sales taxes, and will often demand immediate payment of any liability, no matter what other types of financial responsibilities or consequences the business may be facing. One of the most powerful “weapons” in the CDTFA’s arsenal of collection tactics is the tax lien. Understanding how liens work, why they happen, and what to do if one is recorded against you is important in order to protect your business during times of financial difficulty.

Why Hire an Attorney for Sales Tax Representation?

August 12, 2024February 17, 2016 by Brotman Law

For small business owners with everything on the line, facing down a sales tax audit is a hugely intimidating prospect. In spite of all the possible complications during the audit process, we still see many people attempting to represent themselves before the Board of Equalization. When you are facing a frighteningly large sales tax determination and desperately trying to cut the costs associated with handling the matter, the temptation to tackle the audit yourself rather than investing in a qualified tax attorney can be strong. It is an understandable instinct, but it may not be in your best interest.

Board of Equalization Audits – Short Tests and Sampling – Part Two

August 12, 2024August 23, 2014 by Brotman Law

In general, when auditing a business with good internal control, and a good accounting system, the test period may be a relatively small portion of the total audit period. However, in an audit of a business with little or no internal control, the test period most likely will cover a larger proportion of the audit period. If records are available, the periods selected for test will be spread over the entire audit period so that samples can be taken of all years and all seasons of the year. The size of each test period, in addition to the above considerations, will depend on the number of documents required to be examined. Usually the test periods consist of complete months or quarters, but periods of less than a month may be selected by auditor if daily or weekly controls can be established.

Board of Equalization Audits – Short Tests and Sampling – Part One

August 12, 2024August 23, 2014 by Brotman Law

BOE uses short tests to come up with a decision as to whether to proceed or to accept as correct that item being tested. In fact, BOE encourages its auditors to use short tests when taxpayer’s records are in order. Any time short test can be expanded into full examination.

California Sales Tax Audit Procedures and Techniques

August 12, 2024August 23, 2014 by Brotman Law

The purpose of a California sales tax audit is to correctly measure the tax. The Board of Equalization (BOE) auditor conducts preliminary probing and testing in order to see if there is a potential area of misplaced tax. Sometimes preliminary testing reveals that California sales tax audit of business is not warranted. When deciding whether to waive or perform an audit, the auditors consider the following points:

CDTFA Audit of Sales for Resale

August 12, 2024August 23, 2014 by Brotman Law

A Claimed Sale for Resale is Allowed if Supported by Valid Resale Certificate

A claimed sale for resale will be allowed in a CDTFA audit if it is supported by a resale certificate that is proper in form and is timely taken in good faith from a person who is engaged in the business of selling tangible personal property and who holds a California seller’s permit. If the purchaser is not required to hold a permit because the purchaser sells only property of a kind the retail sale of which is not taxable, e.g., food products for human consumption, or because the purchaser makes no sales in California, an appropriate notation to that effect will be entered in lieu of a seller’s permit number on the resale certificate under Regulation 1667 governing exemption certificate requirements. A certificate will be considered timely if it is taken at any time before the seller bills the purchaser for the property, or any time within the seller’s normal billing and payment cycle, or any time at or prior to delivery of the property to the purchaser. CDTFA auditors can be stringent when enforcing the resale certificate requirement.

Privacy Issues that Arise for Startups Doing Business in or with the Residents of California

August 12, 2024September 30, 2013 by Brotman Law

As in many other areas of law, the State of California has been on the front line of bringing about aggressive changes in the laws concerning protection for online consumers. The economic power and size of California, in addition to being the primary locus for much of the startup activity in the technological world, means that the cost of doing business for many companies includes compliance with California privacy law. Many elements of privacy protection, which are merely recommended by the Federal Trade Commission and other regulatory bodies, are required by statute in California. A prime example is the Online Privacy Protection Act. Technology law scholars, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown, note that the law “requires that any collection of personally identifiable information from California residents through a Web site or online service for commercial purposes be done pursuant to a conspicuously posted privacy policy.” [1] Federal law creates no such requirement for disclosure.