strategies-init

How IRS Collections Works – Part Two

by

IRS Collections Step Three – You Receive a Notice of Intent to Levy (CP 504)

After this sixteen week time period, the taxpayer’s account has entered into IRS collections status. As such, they will receive a threatening letter notifying them of the government’s intent to seize their property if they do not pay their outstanding balance in full or they do not enter into a suitable payment arrangement. This letter will be sent by certified mail to the last known address of the taxpayer. However, in some instances where the taxpayer has a large balance due to the IRS, the IRS may skip the prior Notices of Balance due and jump straight to the Notice of Intent to Levy. This is done to compel action on the part of the taxpayer to resolve the account.

Read more

How IRS Collections Works – Part One

by

There is alot of confusion among many of my clients about the IRS collections process and what actions the IRS is able to legally take against the taxpayer. People who owe balance dues see a series of increasingly threatening letters and I often get panicked phone calls from taxpayers who think that the IRS is going to take their house because of the five thousand dollar balance they have accumulated. As such, I wanted to trace the lifecycle of a balance due to the IRS in order to better educate people on exactly how the IRS collections process works. I hope this serves as a helpful resource and alleviates some of the stress associated with owing money to the government.

Read more

Beat the Clock: Address Tax Problems Early

by

One of the most common problems that I see in my practice is a failure of taxpayers to properly address their tax problems in a timely manner. Many taxpayers feel wait for the problem to grow to a point where serious action must be taken in order to be resolved where the problem could have rather been addressed by simple preventative action at the beginning of the problem. Specifically, this happens often in the arena of collections problems and where taxpayers owe a sum of money to the IRS. While I do want to remind taxpayers that it is never too late to properly resolve a tax issue, I did want to discuss some of the added benefits to solving your tax problems early.

Read more

IRS Innocent Spouse Relief

by

IRS Innocent Spouse Relief

This is the most commonly known form of relief, which can absolves a taxpayer from liability if their spouse or former spouse either did not report income, made an error in the calculation of income, or misapplied any deductions or credits that they were not entitled to. Innocent Spouse Relief relieves a person of any tax, interest, and penalties associated with the account based on the preceding errors. However, the taxpayers are still held jointly and severally liable for any amounts that are not granted innocent spouse relief. The following requirements must be met in order for IRS innocent spouse relief to be granted.

Read more

The CAN-SPAM Act and Compliance Challenges for Startups

by

As our techno-centric culture increasing depends on email as a form of communication, an increasing amount of regulatory attention has been devoted to policing unsolicited bulk electronic communication, much of it unwanted, also known as “SPAM.” Although bulk mail has been in existence for decades, mass electronic messages are extremely inexpensive to produce and distributed, especially when programmers use cookies[1] or other “trolling” features to obtain them. While direct email marketing (along with search engine marketing) is widely considered as the next evolution for early-stage companies looking to raise awareness of their product/service, SPAM is viewed as a considerable annoyance by the general public. Users are often inundated with unsolicited messages and have to waste a lot of precious time sorting through a sea of junk mail, often risking the possibility that legitimate or important email messages will be lost while deleting unwanted mail messages from their inboxes.[2] In addition, a vast majority of the messages received are for products of suspect legality, scams, chain letters, and often pornographic material.[3]

Read more

Issues for Startups – Privacy, Privacy Protection, and Data Security

by

An increasing number of legal challenges for startups that utilize the Internet, are in the area of informational privacy protection. To date, there is no single piece of legislation or bill of rights which provides comprehensive regulation of the collection, storage, transmission or use of personal information.[1] Personal information is defined as data that is used to identify, contact, or locate a person, including name, address, telephone number, or email address. [2] Currently, protection of consumer privacy over the Internet is a piecemeal collection of various state and federal statutes. However, as users and regulators become increasingly savvy about the methods of data collection and its uses, that legislation slowly creates a framework that becomes of increasing importance to small businesses and startups that utilize the internet. The Federal Trade Commission has been particularly active in recent years in assessing the threats posed by online data collection and issuing several reports on the subject.[3] In particular, Congress has already taken action with respect to data collection obtained from minors.[4] Failure to take privacy issues into consideration may subject companies to federal or state action, in addition to consumer class action suits. Because enforcement actions are on the rise, startup companies must exercise particular vigilance in this area to protect themselves and the privacy of their users.

Read more

Privacy Issues that Arise for Startups Doing Business in or with the Residents of California

by

As in many other areas of law, the State of California has been on the front line of bringing about aggressive changes in the laws concerning protection for online consumers. The economic power and size of California, in addition to being the primary locus for much of the startup activity in the technological world, means that the cost of doing business for many companies includes compliance with California privacy law. Many elements of privacy protection, which are merely recommended by the Federal Trade Commission and other regulatory bodies, are required by statute in California. A prime example is the Online Privacy Protection Act. Technology law scholars, Richard Raysman and Peter Brown, note that the law “requires that any collection of personally identifiable information from California residents through a Web site or online service for commercial purposes be done pursuant to a conspicuously posted privacy policy.” [1] Federal law creates no such requirement for disclosure.

Read more

CAN-SPAM

by

Because of public vehemence toward SPAM communication, small businesses and startup must exercise extreme caution when engaging in electronic marketing or any other communication that is not specifically solicited by the user. Failure to do so, in addition to regulatory and civil penalties, can expose a new business to significant damage to their goodwill, which depending on the nature of the business could be fatal to an early-stage company. However, early stage companies can avoid violation of the CAN-SPAM act by engaging in good business practices related to electronic communications. Messages that are advertisements or that otherwise solicit business should identify themselves as an advertisement. The Federal Trade Commission has not issued guidelines on how to achieve disclosure, given the variance in messages and their layout it might be difficult to do so, but communicating in a manner that is clear to the recipient will generally comply with the requirements of the statute.[13] In addition, the message must provide to the recipient the identity of its sender, including critical contact information, such as physical address or registered post-office box and some other means of communication with the sender, such as telephone number or reply email address.

Read more

Issues for Startups – Privacy, Privacy Protection, and Data Security

by

Another key issue for startups when it comes to data security is ensuring compliance the Federal Trade Commission “disposal rule.” Originally implemented as a means as for combating identify theft of information stored on large corporate servers, the Disposal Rule is part of the Fair and Accurate Credit Transactions Act of 2003. In a nutshell, companies are required to implement certain safeguards when destroying electronic files so that these files cannot be read or reconstructed by unauthorized users. As it would pertain to startups, any customers lists, credit reporting data, medical information, and any sensitive financial information or confidential customer communications (relating to online communications companies) should be appropriately safeguarded and disposed of in a prudent fashion.[21]

Read more

Brotman Law Featured in Inc. Magazine - Fastest Growing Law Firm in California