Abuses of the IRS Offer in Compromise Process

The IRS Offer in Compromise (OIC) program lets qualifying taxpayers settle a tax debt for less than the full amount owed. It’s a legitimate option, but the IRS itself has repeatedly warned about “OIC mills” – firms that use aggressive advertising to convince taxpayers their debt can vanish for pennies on the dollar, then charge steep fees regardless of whether the taxpayer actually qualifies. Two of the best documented examples are J.K. Harris and TaxMasters.

J. K. Harris

J.K. Harris & Company was once the largest tax resolution firm in the country, built on advertising that it could settle IRS debts for “pennies on the dollar.” According to a 2008 settlement with attorneys general in 18 states, the company charged clients upfront fees for this service without properly evaluating whether they actually qualified for an Offer in Compromise – and in some cases, while knowing they didn’t. Texas separately sued the company in 2009; that settlement required J.K. Harris to disclose in writing just how few taxpayers actually qualify for OIC. The company later defaulted on a related class-action settlement and was forced into bankruptcy.

Tax Masters

TaxMasters ran a heavy TV ad campaign promising to get customers’ tax bills down to “next to nothing” and to “stand between” them and the IRS. The Texas and Minnesota Attorneys General sued the company for false, misleading, and deceptive business practices. A Texas jury ultimately found TaxMasters liable for more than 110,000 violations of the state’s deceptive trade practices law and ordered $195 million in penalties. Like J.K. Harris, the company filed for bankruptcy shortly after.

What These Cases Reveal About OIC Abuse

Both companies followed the same playbook the IRS now warns taxpayers about every year: advertise a dramatic, guaranteed reduction in tax debt, collect substantial fees upfront, and only then (if ever) evaluate whether the taxpayer actually meets OIC’s technical eligibility requirements. In reality, OIC acceptance hinges on a specific “Reasonable Collection Potential” calculation based on income, assets, and expenses – not a marketing promise. Taxpayers who don’t meet that threshold end up having paid for something they could have found out for free directly from the IRS.

How to Protect Yourself

Before hiring any firm to pursue an Offer in Compromise, be cautious of any company that guarantees a settlement before reviewing your full financial picture, that pressures you to pay large fees upfront, or that discourages you from checking your own eligibility first. A qualified tax attorney should walk you through the RCP calculation honestly, including telling you if an OIC isn’t realistic for your situation.

Considering an Offer in Compromise?

The OIC process is well-defined, but the RCP calculation is what most submissions get wrong. If you’re evaluating whether an OIC is right for your situation, a brief review can confirm whether you’re likely to qualify.

Discuss My Offer in Compromise → Or call: (619) 378-3138

Table of Contents

Related posts

group photo

More about IRS Installment Agreements

Today we discuss some of the specifics of an IRS installment agreement and that taxpayers should be aware of when setting up an IRS installment agreement.
Explanation And Penalties Of Sales Tax Fraud

Explanation and Penalties of Sales Tax Fraud in California

Sales tax fraud is often confused with evasion or negligence. Sam Brotman explains exactly what fraud is and how California penalizes offenders.

What To Do When a Collection Agent Acts Improperly

The collection agent is supposed to have the supervisor give you a call back within 48 hours.
Scroll to Top