Brotman Law handles complex tax disputes — the kind where the IRS is questioning your business structure, where there is real criminal exposure, or where multiple agencies are involved at once. For simpler matters, a CPA or enrolled agent is often the more practical choice. This page explains the difference.

The cases we are built for

We represent businesses, business owners, and high-net-worth individuals in tax disputes that go beyond what a CPA can manage alone. The common thread: something is genuinely at stake, and the facts are genuinely complicated.

You are probably a fit if:

The cases where we are probably not the right fit

We turn cases away when we are not the right tool for the job. That is not a marketing tactic — it is just how we run the practice.

We are probably not the right fit if:

This is not false modesty. It is the honest answer to a question a lot of people do not ask directly.

A more honest answer to the overkill question

Maybe. That depends on what you are actually dealing with.

The short answer is: if your issue is procedural and the facts are straightforward, you probably do not need a tax attorney. A good CPA or enrolled agent can handle IRS correspondence audits, respond to CP notices, and help you get into an installment agreement. These are real skills. They are just not what we do.

What we do is represent people when the IRS or the DOJ has decided they want something your accounting team cannot fight. We have represented 2,500+ clients in matters ranging from criminal tax investigations to multi-year FTB residency disputes to international FBAR cases. The clients who are right for us are the ones who cannot afford a wrong answer — whether that is because the stakes are high financially, personally, or both.

If you are genuinely uncertain, the most useful thing we can do is spend 15 minutes talking through your situation and tell you honestly whether you need us. If you do not, we will say so.

What to do if you are not sure

If you are unsure whether your situation clears the threshold, here is a practical test:

If the answer to any of these is yes, it is worth a conversation. If all four are no, a CPA may be the better first call — and we are happy to point you in the right direction.

Book a free 15-minute call.

Frequently asked questions

How complex does my case need to be for Brotman Law to make sense?

There is no single threshold, but a useful benchmark is $25,000 or more at issue with an IRS Revenue Agent assigned to your case. Below that, the cost of specialized legal representation often outweighs the benefit. Above that — particularly when business transactions or multi-year audits are involved — the risk of getting it wrong is high enough that legal representation pays for itself.

Do I need a tax attorney or a CPA?

A CPA is the right call for tax preparation, compliance, and simple IRS notices. A tax attorney is the right call when there is a legal dispute — when the IRS is challenging your position on a legal question, when criminal exposure exists, or when you need attorney-client privilege to protect your communications. The practical test: if you would want the conversation to be privileged, call a tax attorney.

Is there a minimum dollar amount for cases Brotman Law takes?

We do not have a posted floor, but as a practical matter the cases we are best suited for involve at least $25,000 at issue. Below that threshold, the economics rarely favor full legal representation when other options exist.

What if I am not sure how complicated my situation is?

Book a free 15-minute call. We will tell you honestly whether your situation warrants legal representation, whether a CPA is the better fit, or whether it is somewhere in between. We would rather spend 15 minutes helping you find the right answer than have you hire us when we are not the right tool for the job.

California Service Areas  ·  Disclaimer