CUIC § 1735: When the EDD Comes After You Personally

CUIC § 1735 lets the EDD assess a corporation’s or LLC’s unpaid payroll taxes against the officers and owners who ran it — personally, with penalties and interest. It is California’s payroll-tax cousin to the IRS Trust Fund Recovery Penalty, and it arrives when the business is already in trouble.

The elements track the federal ones: the EDD must show you were a responsible person — an officer, major stockholder, or anyone with charge of the entity’s affairs — who willfully failed to pay when the entity could not. And like the federal version, the defense lives in the facts: who actually controlled the bank account, quarter by quarter; what you knew and when; whether other creditors were paid while withholdings went unremitted. Titles and signature cards start the analysis; they do not end it. Our California tax collection attorney page explains how the EDD, the CDTFA and the FTB collect once an assessment is final.

How § 1735 cases differ from the federal TFRP

Three ways that matter. The § 1735 assessment can reach all the entity’s unpaid contributions and withholdings, not just the trust-fund portion — often making the state exposure proportionally worse. The procedure runs through the EDD’s assessment machinery, which means a 30-day CUIAB petition window of its own — the deadline most people miss because the notice arrives amid the entity’s collapse. And the same facts frequently generate a parallel § 6672 federal assessment, so the defense should be built once, consistently, for both — statements made in one proceeding follow you into the other.

If the notice names you

File the petition inside 30 days, before anything else. Then build the record: bank signature authority, who issued payment instructions, board minutes, the timeline of when you learned of the shortfall. Do not narrate your role to an EDD collector by phone first — responsibility and willfulness are assembled from exactly those calls. And if the underlying entity assessment is still contestable, contest it: every dollar knocked off the classification or wage findings is a dollar that never reaches you personally.

How engagements work

Many matters like this one run as a monthly flat-fee engagement: one number, agreed up front, that covers the work — agency contact, deadlines, document responses, strategy — until the matter resolves. Shorter, well-defined projects are often a one-time flat fee instead, and some matters genuinely fit hourly billing better. We will tell you which you are looking at on the first call, before you commit to anything. If you want the details first, see how we price our work.

Named personally under CUIC 1735?

Tell us what the notice says. We respond within one business day.






Or book directly: free 15-minute call · (619) 378-3138

Related: California payroll tax attorney · EDD audit defense · the CDTFA’s parallel statute.

By Sam Brotman, JD, LLM, MBA — managing attorney, Brotman Law. CA Bar No. 274966. Last updated August 29, 2026.

Table of Contents

Related posts

VideoBG101

What Do I Do If There Is a Serious Error on My Return and I Get Audited?

The hook for whatever the taxable adjustment is as a result of the air you may be able to leverage it to your advantage.
Tax attorney consultation at Brotman Law

How the IRS Conducts Financial Analysis

If you are trying to work with the IRS on an installment payment agreement of your tax debt, you may be wondering exactly how they determine who gets approved and who does not.

ERC Refunds: The Fork in the Road – Administrative Path vs. Litigation

Is your ERC refund delayed? Discover how filing a lawsuit against the IRS can expedite your claim, force a resolution, and potentially lead to a settlement. Learn how litigation could help you recover your refund faster.
Scroll to Top